X (Twitter) Mention Monitor with Claude Code
The rule that carries this template is that the ANGLE section is a suggestion and never a position: two or three sentences a person could post, plus whether it should come from the brand account or a founder. Claude Code settles on an approach before it takes a step, and here that approach always ends with a draft sitting in Slack rather than a post on X.
Watch it work before it's live
Run a staged conversation — no account needed. The agent handles it for real while a simulated world answers its tool calls; nothing touches real accounts, and nothing is actually sent.
so the free tier is gone and nobody thought to mention it, cool
Quote tweets our pricing update from this morning. 1,340 reposts, 4,800 likes and 210 replies in three hours, from an account with 48,000 followers that has recommended us twice before. The replies are split: several point out the grandfather clause in our own post, several say they already cancelled. Our original post is still live and has not been updated.
Set up in minutes
Using this template drops you into a guided setup. It asks exactly this, nothing else:
Connect X
One sign-in. The agent acts through your account, scoped to what this template uses.
Connect Slack
One sign-in. The agent acts through your account, scoped to what this template uses.
Brand handles
Every handle worth watching, starting with your brand account and any founder or product accounts people tag instead. Add handles you have renamed away from, because people keep using those for years.
Ping policy
What lifts a mention above the noise: follower counts, tone, whether somebody asked a direct question, and which Slack channel the ones that qualify should land in.
Runs on Claude Code
Preselected for this page — connect your Claude Code account during setup, or switch to NoClick's built-in models with one click.
Watch it handle a test run
A staged conversation against a simulated world — then it’s live.
Why Claude Code for this agent
Draft, then stop
No write operation on X exists in the workflow, so the last step is always a message into your own channel. That limit comes from the wiring rather than from a sentence in the prompt.
Thread read before tone
A three word reply is praise or a dunk depending entirely on what it hangs off. Walking the conversation before judging is the instruction that makes the angle usable.
Before you fork
What happens if it misjudges something serious?
It escalates on shape rather than on sentiment: an outage claim, an invoice screenshot, a journalist, or a thread moving faster than your policy expects goes first, under a blunt line asking for a person. That path exists precisely because tone judgement is the least reliable thing any model does, and the escalation rules deliberately do not depend on it.
Run it with a different agent
Put X (Twitter) Mention Monitor to work on Claude Code
Free to start. Guided setup, a test run against staged conversations, and it's live.