Zendesk CSAT Follow-up Agent

Every low rating comes back explained: the moment the ticket turned, quoted from the thread, whether this customer has been let down before, and one recovery step, written on the ticket and sent to your CX lead.

0 in use9
Loading preview…
Guided setup — test it before connecting anything.

Watch it work before it's live

Run a staged conversation — no account needed. The agent handles it for real while a simulated world answers its tool calls; nothing touches real accounts, and nothing is actually sent.

CSAT 1/5 on ticket #48213

Open

Yuki Tanabe <#48213>

Three different people asked me to send the same screenshot, and the third one asked me to explain the whole problem again from the beginning. Eleven days to change one setting. I have no confidence it would go any better next time.

Set up in minutes

Using this template drops you into a guided setup. It asks exactly this, nothing else:

  1. Connect Zendesk

    One sign-in. The agent acts through your account, scoped to what this template uses.

  2. Connect Slack

    One sign-in. The agent acts through your account, scoped to what this template uses.

  3. Followup rules

    Which scores you want worked and what should happen to them: the threshold that counts as low, who gets the Slack line, the accounts or plans that always matter, and what a reasonable recovery step looks like at your company.

  4. Choose which agent runs it

    NoClick's built-in models work out of the box — or bring Claude Code, Codex, and other coding agents on your own subscription.

  5. Watch it handle a test run

    A staged conversation against a simulated world — then it’s live.

About this agent

A CSAT dashboard tells you eleven people were unhappy last week and nothing whatsoever about why. This agent opens each low rating, reads the ticket the way a manager would, finds the exact message where it went wrong, checks whether that customer has been through this before, and leaves all of it on the ticket with one thing you could do today. It never messages the customer, because deciding to make it right is a human call and usually costs money.

What people use it for

  • Every bad score gets read - Low ratings arrive faster than anybody reviews them, so most are never opened at all. Here each one is read within the hour it lands, on a Sunday as readily as a Tuesday.
  • The moment it turned, quoted - The note carries the actual message where the tone changed, with its timestamp, so nobody has to reconstruct what happened from memory in a meeting a week later.
  • Patterns, not incidents - The requester's history says whether this was one bad day or the third time this quarter. That is the difference between owing somebody an apology and a churn risk you can still catch.
  • Fair material for coaching - Because it quotes the thread instead of characterising anyone, the note holds up in a one to one. Nobody is called slow; a fourteen hour queue is described as a fourteen hour queue.

Before you fork

What counts as low, and what happens to the good scores?

You set both in the follow-up rules. Anything you call good is counted and dropped without a note or a message, so a happy week is quiet rather than a channel full of congratulations. Only the scores you name get the full read, the internal note and the line to your CX lead.

Is this going to be used against my agents?

It quotes the ticket rather than characterising anyone, and it is instructed never to blame a named person for something the thread does not show. Notes sit on the ticket where your team can already read them, so nothing is written about somebody somewhere they cannot see it. In practice it defends agents as often as not, because the turning point is frequently a queue rather than a bad reply.

What does it need in Zendesk, and what does it cost?

Satisfaction ratings have to be switched on in Zendesk, and the connection needs to read tickets and comments, list a requester's other tickets, and add internal comments. Cost is one agent run per rating you choose to work, so it follows your low score volume rather than your ticket volume. Good ratings finish in a fraction of a run, because it stops as soon as it has checked the score.

Run it with your coding agent

Works with

More agents like this

Browse all agent templates →

Put Zendesk CSAT Follow-up Agent to work

Free to start. Guided setup, a test run against staged conversations, and it's live.